As per the scheme of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“Code”), an application for initiation of corporate initiation resolution process (“CIRP”) can be filed by the debtor itself or by a financial or operational creditor. The Code provides for filing of record of default recorded with the Information Utility (“IU”) as evidence of default, along with other specified documents.Continue Reading Proving default: IU reports not the be-all and end-all
Animesh Bisht
Partner in the Dispute Resolution Team at the Mumbai office of Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas. He regularly advises and represents clients, both Indian and foreign, before various forums including the National Company Law Tribunals, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Securities and Exchange Board of India, Securities Appellate Tribunal, various High Courts and the Supreme Court. He regularly appears and argues matters before these forums. Animesh has been involved in various high profile and precedent setting litigations in the insolvency and bankruptcy practice. He can be reached at animesh.bisht@cyrilshroff.com.
Relevant or Relied Upon? Bombay High Court Clears Air on Disclosure of Information by Banks in Wilful Defaulter Proceedings
In Mr. Milind Patel v. Union Bank of India & Ors.[1] (“Judgment”), the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court (“Court”) has inter alia held that lenders/ banks seeking to invoke the Reserve Bank of India, Master Circular on Wilful Defaulters (“Master Circular”) for declaring entities and/ or persons as wilful defaulters, must supply all relevant materials to the noticee, which includes not only incriminating material but also exculpatory material. The Court therefore clarified that a bank is obligated to provide all relevant materials and not just information ‘referred to’ and ‘relied upon’ in the show-cause notice when conducting proceedings under the Master Circular.Continue Reading Relevant or Relied Upon? Bombay High Court Clears Air on Disclosure of Information by Banks in Wilful Defaulter Proceedings