Photo of Madhavi Khanna

Principal Associate in the Litigation and Arbitration Practice at the NOIDA office of Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas. Madhavi specialises in the field of commercial litigation, infrastructure arbitrations, insolvency resolution, and appellate side practice before the Supreme Court, Delhi High Court and the NCLAT. She can be reached at madhavi.khanna@cyrilsrhoff.com

Extension under Section 29A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 not a possibility if application for extension is not made while mandate subsisted

The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in Rohan Builders (India) Pvt. Ltd v Berger Paints India Limited 2023 SCC OnLine Cal 2645 recently deliberated on the issue of whether Courts can extend an arbitral tribunal’s mandate under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”), after the mandate of the arbitral tribunal has been terminated.Continue Reading Extension under Section 29A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 not a possibility if application for extension is not made while mandate subsisted